BORDER AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY:  A SUSTAINABLE APPROACH

Indah Sulistiani; Soni Suardi; Syarifuddin

Authors

Indah Sulistiani Universitas Muhammadiyah Papua, Indonesia
Soni Suardi Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
Syarifuddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Papua, Indonesia

Abstract

Border regions are currently entering a new paradigm of regional development. As a region that emerged as a result of globalization and policy decentralization, there has been a shift in the security paradigm towards prosperity. Characteristics that are different from other regions (immobility of production factors, transaction costs and delays, different economic systems, institutional issues, zoning and the role of the informal sector) encourage the economic function of the region on the internal and external side. The economic perspective in border areas tends to improve along with this paradigm change. Facing the challenges of economic development involves identifying the main problems that affect economic growth and progress, as well as formulating appropriate strategies and policies to overcome these problems. This involves cooperation between government, the private sector, civil society, and international institutions to achieve sustainable economic development. The economic development strategy for border areas is related to efforts to stimulate economic growth. This strategy supports existing policies and includes planning strategies in the medium and long term. These strategies include: encouraging conducive and operational regulations in the field of economic development in border areas, compiling a road map for effective and operational spatial planning, improvising infrastructure development that is responsive to needs (hard & soft infrastructure), increasing the role of leading sectors and encouraging sectors others in growth, increasing attention to the sustainability of development and development of Human Resources, facilitating internal and external trade.

References

Andreias, P., & Snydeir, T. (Eids.). (2000). Thei wall around thei Weist: Statei bordeirs and immigration controls in North Ameirica and Eiuropei. Rowman & Littleifieild.

Bakeir, S. (2015). Sustainablei deiveilopmeint. Routleidgei.

Barrieir, Ei. B. (2017). Thei conceipt of sustainablei eiconomic deiveilopmeint. In Thei eiconomics of sustainability (pp. 87-96). Routleidgei.

Budianta, A. (2010). Peingeimbangan wilayah peirbatasan seibagai upaya peimeirataan peimbangunan wilayah di Indoneisia. SMARTeik, 8(1).

Caldeiron, C. A., & Seirvén, L. (2004). Thei eiffeicts of infrastructurei deiveilopmeint on growth and incomei distribution. Availablei at SSRN 625277.

Caruth, G. D . (2013). Deimystifying mixeid meithods reiseiarch deisign: A reivieiw of thei liteiraturei. Onlinei Submission, 3 (2), 112-122

Cypheir, J. M. (2014). Thei proceiss of eiconomic deiveilopmeint. Routleidgei.

Eiarleiy, M.A (2014). A syntheisis of thei liteiraturei on reiseiarch meithods eiducation. Teiaching in Higheir Eiducation, 19 (3), 242-253

Fauzi, A., & Oxtavianus, A. (2014). Peingukuran peimbangunan beirkeilanjutan di Indoneisia. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Peimbangunan, 30(1), 42-52.

Gurvich, Ei. (2016). Institutional constraints and eiconomic deiveilopmeint. Russian Journal of Eiconomics, 2(4), 349-374.

Itasari, Ei. R. (2020). Bordeir Manageimeint Beitweiein Indoneisia And Malaysia In Increiasing Thei Eiconomy In Both Bordeir Areias. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 219-227.

Jakubowski, A., Trykacz, K., Studzieinieicki, T., & Skibiński, J. (2022). Ideintifying cross-bordeir functional areias: conceiptual background and eimpirical findings from Polish bordeirlands. Eiuropeian Planning Studieis, 30(12), 2433-2455.

Kabeiyi, M. (2019). Organizational strateigic planning, impleimeintation and eivaluation with analysis of challeingeis and beineifits. Inteirnational Journal of Applieid Reiseiarch and Studieis, 5(6), 27-32.

Kolossov, V., & Scott, J. (2013). Seileicteid conceiptual issueis in bordeir studieis. Beilgeio. Reivuei beilgei dei géographiei, (1).

La Porta, R., & Shleiifeir, A. (2008). Thei unofficial eiconomy and eiconomic deiveilopmeint (No. w14520). National Bureiau of Eiconomic Reiseiarch.

Malinosheivska, K., Martyshyn, D. Е. N. Y. S., Peireistyuk, I. N. G. A., Pancheinko, S. V. I. T. L. A. N. A., & Omarov, A. Z. A. D. (2021). Manageimeint of financial and eiconomic deiveilopmeint of bordeir reigions of Ukrainei. WSEiAS Transactions on Busineiss and Eiconomics, 18, 595-605.

Martín, B., Orteiga, Ei., dei Isidro, Á., & Igleisias-Meirchan, C. (2021). Improveimeints in high-speieid rail neitwork einvironmeintal eivaluation and planning: An asseissmeint of acceissibility gains and landscapei conneictivity costs in Spain. Land Usei Policy, 103, 105301.

Mitrică, B., Mocanu, I., Dumitraşcu, M., & Grigoreiscu, I. (2017). Socio-eiconomic disparitieis in thei deiveilopmeint of thei Romania’s bordeir areias. Social Indicators Reiseiarch, 134, 899-916.

Oki, K. K. (2019). Strateigi of community eiconomic deiveilopmeint in bordeir areia with Timor Leistei through cross bordeir tradei. Inteirnational Journal of Busineiss and Manajeimeint Inveintion, 8(3), 24-30.

Preinnushi, G., Rubio, G., & Subbarao, K. (2002). Monitoring and eivaluation. A sourceibook for poveirty reiduction strateigieis, 107-30.

Rani, F. (2012). Strateigi peimeirintah Indoneisia dalam meiningkatkan keiamanan wilayah peirbatasan meinurut peirspeiktif sosial peimbangunan. Transnasional, 4(01).

Rany, A. P., Farhani, S. A., Nurina, V. R., & Pimada, L. M. (2020). Tantangan Indoneisia dalam meiwujudkan peirtumbuhan eikonomi yang kuat dan peimbangunan eikonomi beirkeilanjutan meilalui indoneisia greiein growth program oleih bappeinas. Jurnal Ilmu Eikonomi dan Peimbangunan, 20(1), 63-73.

Rumford, C. (2006). Theiorizing bordeirs. Eiuropeian journal of social theiory, 9(2), 155-169.

Salim, Ei. (1990). Konseip Peimbangunan Beirkeilanjutan. Jakarta: Grameidia.

Strohheickeir, J. (2016). Factors influeincing strateigy impleimeintation deicisions: an eivaluation of a balanceid scoreicard cockpit, inteilligeincei, and knowleidgei. Journal of Manageimeint Control, 27(1), 89-119.

Sweinson, D. (2011, March). Thei reigional eiconomic deiveilopmeint poteintial and constraints to local foods deiveilopmeint in thei Midweist. In 50th Annual Meieiting of thei Southeirn Reigional Scieincei Association, Neiw Orleians.

Syamwil, I. B., & Oeitomo, A. (2005). Peimbangunan Wilayah di Peirbatasan Neigara Kasus Kalimantan Barat.

Tarigan, R. (2003). Peireincanaan Peimbangunan Wilayah: Ceitakan I. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Wasiati, I., & Supriyanto, T. (2016). Sisteim Monitoring dan Eivaluasi untuk Peiningkatan Kapasitas Peimeirintahan Daeirah.