ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE POLICY OF INVOLVEMENT OF 25 PERCENT WOMEN IN STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • Achmad Zahruddin Universitas Baturaja, Indonesia

Keywords:

25 Percent, Women , State-Owned Enterprises

Abstract

One of the new and different policies from previous governments is the policy of gender empowerment through the involvement of a minimum of 25% of women in State-Owned Enterprises to create gender equality (Sugiyono 2019). On the one hand, we think this policy is good for implementing gender equality and women have a number of emotional and skill advantages where women are usually more detailed and more diligent than men. However, on the other hand, a number of groups consider that this policy is not necessary because if the women who are categorized as having the skills and emotions that are conveyed, they will automatically get a position/position in a company without having to require a minimum policy of 25%. Therefore, researchers aim to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of implementing 25% women's involvement in BUMN. The research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach, namely describing things related to women. The data used in this research is secondary data that researchers obtained from scientific manuscripts, books and other references that are usually used in every research. These data were analyzed using the SWOT analysis technique

References

Abdurahman, Soejana. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Abdurrahman Abdurrahman, and Ema Tusianti. 2021. “Apakah Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dalam Ekonomi Dan Politik Telah Meningkatkan IPM Perempuan Indonesia?” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia 21(2): 204–19.

Chattopadhyay, R. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72(5): 1409.

Choudhary, A. 2010. “Impact of Women Heads-of-State on Human Development.” Global Journal of Business Research 4(4): 71–79.

Giyono, U. 2021. “Perempuan Dalam Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (Kajian IPM-IPG Dan IDG Sumber Kemenpp Tahun 2019).” Jurnal Jendela Hukum 8(2): 75–86.

Imam Gunawan. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kencana, Maulandy Rizky Bayu. 2023. “25 Persen Perempuan Kuasai BUMN, PDB Indonesia Potensi Naik Rp 1.920 Triliun.” Liputan 6: 1. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4681528/25-persen-perempuan-kuasai-bumn-pdb-indonesia-potensi-naik-rp-1920-triliun?page=2.

Lexy J. Moleong. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2018.

Lusiarista. 20222. “Peran Perempuan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Karesidenan Pati Periode 2015-2020. Sosial Science Studies.” Sosial Science Studies 2(3): 197–214.

Rimbawan, Teguh, Ari Susantiaji, and Ardina Wuri Hermanyanti. 2023. “Pengaruh Pemimpin Perempuan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan.” Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi 15(1): 49–63.

Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.

Utami, Fajria Anindya. 2023. “Apa Itu Boikot?” Warta Ekonomi: 1. https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read300051/apa-itu-boikot.

Utaminingsih, A. 2014. Perilaku Organisasi. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles