ANALYZING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TAX POLICIES IN IMPROVING A COMPANY'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INVOLVES ASSESSING HOW TAXATION STRATEGIES IMPACT THE OVERALL ECONOMIC HEALTH OF THE BUSINESS
Keywords:
Tax Policies, Financial Performance, Taxation Strategies, Economic Health, and Fiscal Well-being offer a comprehensive and detailed perspective on the historical evolution of tax policy effectiveness, spanning diverse temporal contexts.Abstract
This research engages in a thorough retrospective analysis to assess the historical effectiveness of tax policies in shaping the financial performance of companies. Through meticulous exploration of diverse taxation strategies employed over an extended temporal horizon, the study delves into the intricate dynamics that directly influence the overall economic health of businesses. The research reveals nuanced patterns and correlations by parsing through financial data and scrutinizing economic indicators, offering a rich understanding of the complex relationship between taxation strategies and fiscal well-being. Findings from this retrospective analysis contribute significantly to the ongoing discourse on the pivotal role of tax policies in corporate financial landscapes. The study unveils historical trends and establishes a robust foundation for informed considerations in future tax policy formulation and strategic financial planning. The keywords guiding this research—Tax Policies, Financial Performance, Taxation Strategies, Economic Health, and Fiscal Well-being—provide a comprehensive framework for exploring the multifaceted aspects of tax policy effectiveness, transcending temporal boundaries. This retrospective exploration is not confined to a specific era but spans diverse temporal contexts, offering insights that inform future financial strategies. The research serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, businesses, and academics alike, providing nuanced perspectives on the evolving nature of tax policies and their enduring impact on the financial trajectories of companies. The insights gleaned from this study underscore the imperative for adaptive financial strategies that navigate the dynamic interplay between taxation policies and corporate fiscal well-being.
References
Allioui, H., & Mourdi, Y. (2023). Exploring the Full Potentials of IoT for Better Financial Growth and Stability: A Comprehensive Survey. Sensors, 23(19), 8015.
Baah, C., Jin, Z., & Tang, L. (2020). Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: investigating corporate reputation as a missing link—Journal of cleaner production, 247, 119125.
Bhattarai, B. P., Paudyal, S., Luo, Y., Mohanpurkar, M., Cheung, K., Tonkoski, R., ... & Zhang, X. (2019). Big data analytics in smart grids: state‐of‐the‐art, challenges, opportunities, and future directions. IET Smart Grid, 2(2), 141-154.
Blessing, H., & Sakouvogui, G. (2023). Impact of Liq identity and Solvency Ratios on Financial Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis. Indonesia Auditing Research Journal, 12(3), 102-115.
Bodemer, O. (2023). Harmonizing Epochs: Blockchain Technology at the Intersection of Friedman’s Monetary Policy and Keynesian Economic Principles.
Chemutai, A. (2019). The Effect of Macro-economic Variables on Commercial Banki g Sector Financial Performance in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Dupont, Q., & Karpoff, J. M. (2020). The trust triangle: Laws, reputation, and culture in empirical finance research. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 217-238.
Eggers, F. (2020). Masters of disaster? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. Jou nal of Business Resea ch, 116, 199-208.
Ehrenberg, Ronald, Robert Smith, and Ke in Hallock. Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy. Routledge, 2021.
Garton, K. (2021. International trade and investment agreements and policy space for food environment regulation (Doctoral dissertation, ResearchSpace@ Auckland).
Gautier, A., & Pache, A. C. (2015). Resea ch on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 343-369.
Gautier, A., & Pache, A. C. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 343-369.
Grewatsch, S., & Kleindienst, I. (2017). Hen, does it pay to be good? Moderators and mediators in the corporate sustainability–corporate financial performance relationship: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 383-416.
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018. Two methodological approaches to integrating mixed methods and case study design: a systematic review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900-918.
Kanger, L., Sovacool, B. K., & Noork iv, M. (2020). Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Research Policy, 49(7), 104072.
Lapologang, S., & Zhao, S. (2023). The impact of environmental policy mechanisms on green innovation performance: the roles of environmental disclosure and political ties. Technology in Society, 75, 102332.
Li, J., Xu, Q., Cuomo, R., Purushothaman, V., & Mackey, T. (2020). Data mining and content analysis of the Chinese social media platform Weibo during the early COVID-19 outbreak: retrospective observational infoveillance study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18700.
Li, Y., & Zhang, S. (2022). Qualitative data analysis. In Applied Research Methods in Urban and Regional Planning g (pp. 149-165). Cham: Spr nger International Publishing.
Nica, I. Chiriță, N., & Delcea, C. (2023). Towards a sustainable future: Economic cybernetics in analyzing Romania's circular economy. Sustainability, 15(19), 14433.
Ponelis, S. R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises—International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 535.
Sarfi, M., Darvishi, M., Zohour, M., Nosrati, S., & Zamani, M. (2021). Google’s University? An exploration of academic influence on the tech giant's propaganda. Journal of Cyb rspace Studies, 5(2), 181-202.
Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánche , R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 107-132.
Sun, P., Doh, P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818-1853.
Teece, D. J. (2018). P profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2020) Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 27(2), 694-705.
Wang, Z., Zhang, J., & Ullah, H. (2023). I am exploring the multidimensional perspective of retail investors' attention: the mediating influence of corporate governance and information disclosure on corporate environmental performance in China: Sustainability, 15(15), 11818.
Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2015). Climate change, cap talisman, and corporations. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE © 2023 by Adisam Publisher is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
