BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC COMMUNICATION: ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE BIASES ON DECISION-MAKING
Keywords:
Behavioral Economics, Cognitive Biases, Decision-Making, Economic Communication, Confirmation Bias, Loss Aversion, Behavioral Insight.Abstract
Behavioral economics, a dynamic field at the intersection of psychology and economics, recognizes that human decision-making is far from the rational, utility-maximizing model traditionally assumed in economic theory. This study delves into the profound implications of cognitive biases on decision-making and explores how effective economic communication can mitigate their effects. Key findings reveal the prevalence of cognitive biases, including confirmation bias, anchoring, and loss aversion, impacting a majority of decision-makers. These biases significantly affect personal finance, investment, and public policy choices. Effective communication strategies, message framing, and behavioral insights are pivotal in countering these biases and improving decision quality. Armed with an understanding of cognitive biases, economic experts and policymakers can tailor communication and policy design to promote rational choices. The study also identifies challenges and future directions, emphasizing the ongoing need for research and innovative strategies. In conclusion, this research sheds Light on the interplay between cognitive biases, economic communication, and decision-making, offering insights into strategies for enhancing economic well-being and promoting informed choices.
References
Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review. Management Decision, 59(3), 638-652.
Altman, M. (2015). Handbook of contemporary behavioral economics: foundations and developments. Routledge.
Bahaddin, B., Weinberg, S., Luna‐Reyes, L. F., & Andersen, D. (2019). Building a bridge to behavioral economics: Countervailing cognitive biases in lifetime saving decisions. System Dynamics Review, 35(3), 187-207.
Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E., Miskon, S., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 8.
Battaglio Jr, R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304-320.
Bhandari, S., & Molenaar, K. R. (2020). Using debiasing strategies to manage cognitive biases in construction risk management: Recommendations for practice and future research. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 25(4), 04020033.
Collins, M. E., & Loughran, T. A. (2017). Rational choice theory, heuristics, and biases. The Oxford Handbook of offender decision making, 6, 10.
Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Wieland, A. (2017). A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(4), 67-85.
Earl, P. E. (2018). Richard H. Thaler: A Nobel prize for behavioral economics. Review of Political Economy, 30(2), 107-125.
Emmons, D. L., Mazzuchi, T. A., Sarkani, S., & Larsen, C. E. (2018). Mitigating cognitive biases in risk identification: Practitioner checklist for the aerospace sector. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 25(1), 52.
Fulton, E. A. (2021). Opportunities to improve ecosystem‐based fisheries management by recognizing and overcoming path dependency and cognitive bias. Fish and Fisheries, 22(2), 428-448.
Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., & Ohlson, D. (2012). Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. John Wiley & Sons.
Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973-986.
Hilbert, M. (2012). Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 211.
Khan, M. Z. U. (2017). Impact of availability bias and loss aversion bias on investment decision making, moderating role of risk perception. Management & Administration (IMPACT: JMDGMA), 1(1), 17-28.
Korteling, J. E., & Toet, A. (2020). Cognitive biases. Encyclopedia of behavioral neuroscience.
Larsen, J. K., Hollands, G. J., Garland, E. L., Evers, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2023). Be more mindful: Targeting addictive responses by integrating mindfulness with cognitive bias modification or cue exposure interventions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105408.
Lavecchia, A. M., Liu, H., & Oreopoulos, P. (2016). The behavioral economics of education: Progress and possibilities. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 1-74). Elsevier.
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
Machlup, F. (2014). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance, Volume III: The economics of information and human capital (Vol. 781). Princeton University Press.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris, 30(1), 77-102.
Montibeller, G., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk analysis, 35(7), 1230-1251.
Neshani, A., Zare, H., Sadeghian, H., Safdari, H., Riahi-Zanjani, B., & Aryan, E. (2023). A Comparative Study on Visual Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Closed Tube Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification: Shedding Light on the Use of Eriochrome Black T. Diagnostics, 13(1), 155.
Nguyen, T. T., Pham, T. A. T., & Tram, H. T. X. (2020). Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 261, 110162.
Petticrew, M., Maani, N., Pettigrew, L., Rutter, H., & Van Schalkwyk, M. C. (2020). Dark nudges and sludge in big alcohol: behavioral economics, cognitive biases, and alcohol industry corporate social responsibility. The Milbank Quarterly, 98(4), 1290-1328.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage publications.
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955-969.
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065.
Wendel, S. (2020). Designing for behavior change: Applying psychology and behavioral economics. O'Reilly Media.
Zohuri, B., & Mossavar-Rahmani, F. (2023). The Symbiotic Relationship Unraveling the Interplay between Technology and Artificial Intelligence (An Intelligent Dynamic Relationship). Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 17, 63-68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE © 2023 by Adisam Publisher is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
